Critical Reflection UCS 1001
At the
start of the module, I set out with 2 personal goals in mind:
1.
Processing Information from the Speaker’s Point of View
2.
Achieving Bias-Free Communication
Being able
to process information from the speaker’s point of view was especially
challenging for me, as we were often clouded with our own ideals, ego and
mindset that we are always so fixated on. I heavily believed in this, as
processing the same information which a different set of perspective,
reasoning, and thoughts. This very belief has reiterated itself multiple times
throughout the project and my own reader response. During the reader response
phase, I was mainly following Emmanuel's guidance for the technicalities of the
FCU and mainly reading off the sources that he provided. However, when I let
GenAI took over the search tool, it brought me to wonder if there was a bias in
each article and what was their Point of View (POV) behind it. This led me to
drift further away from Emmanuel’s train of thought and our reader responses
has 2 different opinions. Not being the full Subject Matter expert in this, I
had doubts if the content was correct, when I consulted Emmanuel and Professor
Brad, both of them gave a general conclusion: Everyone views will be definitely
different and take a different approach to each topic. It dawned onto me that
it is okay for me, to not conform to what the subject matter experts say if you
have the evidence. This has stuck with me for the rest of the trimester and
even until now when I do my own programs for training as a constant reminder to
myself to view information from the creator POV. When presenting a notion, be
fearless when you have solid evidence that you have gathered. This way, you
will be able to process information from your Point of View clearly and know
how to process others the same way you did with your work.
Bias free
communication started off an objective for me, had only turned into a vision
for me. For myself during the project, I often found myself in situations that
I was constantly using my own experiences to best do what is required from the
project. However, that was only limited my field of view of how I did the
project with my teammates. When my teammates were to trying to aim for a
different perspective towards how the report would be done, the first thought
that came to me was the fact that this would not go with the initial flow. This
led to us having many heated disagreements, and having my teammates to jolt me
out of my own framework to view things from another perspective. It seemed that
everything seemed to revolve back on the same point of processing information
from differing perspectives. Without looking and listening in detail into that
same piece of information from a differing perspective, how are we supposed to
determine if there is possible bias in our communication? To add on, everyone
has differing experiences in their life of history. This generates differing
perspectives towards issues which leads to differing minds. Hence, the only way
to achieve bias-free communication is to only let go off all your perspectives
and look at the subject as objectively as possible. Although I did not manage
to achieve it in this module, this vision will continue to a constant target
that I aspire to achieve as I progress on in life.
Comments
Post a Comment